Free what now? First Amendsomethingorother?

SoundAndFury's picture

In the wake of Senator Joseph Lieberman (I-CT) and Susan Collins' (R-ME) alarmist report, "Violent Islamist Extremism, the Internet, and the Homegrown Terrorism Threat," the Senate may be moving towards passage of the Orwellian "Violent Radicalization and Homegrown Terrorism Prevention Act of 2007" (S. 1959)...

the Democrat-controlled Congress seems ready to jettison Constitutional guarantees of free speech and assembly. The bill passed the House by a 404-6 vote in October...

Under cover of studying "violent radicalization," both bills would broaden the already-fluid definition of "terrorism" to encompass political activity and protest by dissident groups, effectively criminalizing civil disobedience and non-violent direct action by developing policies for "prevention, disruption and mitigation."

Comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
PMMJ's picture

advocating the devil

Well, the website this article comes from is a little suspect. Since, you know, they advocate 9/11 conspiracy theories and other exciting odds and ends.

Not to say there's not problems with the act. I might give my Senator a call and let them know I have concerns. But the coverage on globalresearch.ca might be a little... slanted.

SoundAndFury's picture

Oh I agree with you on the

Oh I agree with you on the slant. Still, it's all a bit much.

Single Entendre's picture

wait, what?

How do you...

Why is the....

And what about...

Oh, fuck that noise!

-------
The only difference between theory and practice is that in theory, there is none.

SoundAndFury's picture

Jesus. Fucking. Christ.

Jesus. Fucking. Christ.