
In the wake of Senator Joseph Lieberman (I-CT) and Susan Collins' (R-ME) alarmist report, "Violent Islamist Extremism, the Internet, and the Homegrown Terrorism Threat," the Senate may be moving towards passage of the Orwellian "Violent Radicalization and Homegrown Terrorism Prevention Act of 2007" (S. 1959)...
Under cover of studying "violent radicalization," both bills would broaden the already-fluid definition of "terrorism" to encompass political activity and protest by dissident groups, effectively criminalizing civil disobedience and non-violent direct action by developing policies for "prevention, disruption and mitigation."
Comments
advocating the devil
Well, the website this article comes from is a little suspect. Since, you know, they advocate 9/11 conspiracy theories and other exciting odds and ends.
Not to say there's not problems with the act. I might give my Senator a call and let them know I have concerns. But the coverage on globalresearch.ca might be a little... slanted.
Oh I agree with you on the
Oh I agree with you on the slant. Still, it's all a bit much.
wait, what?
How do you...
Why is the....
And what about...
Oh, fuck that noise!
-------
The only difference between theory and practice is that in theory, there is none.
Jesus. Fucking. Christ.
Jesus. Fucking. Christ.